‘Parade’ Is Rachel Cusk’s Lonely Experiment
Start, as one tends to do in Rachel Cusk’s writing, with a home. It isn’t yours, however as an alternative a farmhouse on the island property to which you will have come as a renting vacationer. It has no apparent entrance door, and the way you enter it, or whether or not you’re welcome to take action, isn’t clear. You might be, in spite of everything, solely a customer. Constructed out in haphazard style, the home appears each uncared for and fussed over, and consequently barely mad. A small door, as soon as positioned, opens to disclose two rooms. The primary, though generously proportioned and effectively lit, shocks you with its dysfunction, the riotous and but deadening muddle of a hoarder. As you navigate rigorously via it, the sound of ladies’s voices leads you to a second room. It’s the kitchen, the place the proprietor’s spouse, a younger woman, and an outdated lady—three generations of feminine labor—put together meals in a clear and practical house. If you enter, they fall silent and appear to share a secret. They consent to somewhat than encourage your presence, however right here you’ll be fed. Of the primary room, the proprietor’s spouse feedback dryly that it’s her husband’s: “I’m not allowed to intrude with something right here.”
It is a second from Parade, Cusk’s new e book, and like a lot on this novel of elusive vignettes, it may be seen as an allegory about each fiction and the gendered shapes of selfhood. After studying Parade, you is likely to be tempted to think about the historical past of the novel as a cyclical battle between accumulation and erasure, or hoarders and cleaners. For the hoarders, the ethos is to seize as a lot life as attainable: objects, atmospheres, ideologies, social varieties and conventions, the habits and habitudes of selves. For the cleaners, all of that element leaves us no house to maneuver or breathe. The hoarder novel might protect, however the cleaner novel liberates. And that labor of cleansing, of showing the naked surfaces beneath the accrued muddle of our lives and opening up house for creation and nourishment, is ladies’s work. Or so Cusk’s allegory invitations us to really feel.
Whether or not or not the typology of hoarder and cleaner is helpful basically, it has licensed Cusk to push her model towards ever better spareness. For the previous decade, since 2014’s Define, Cusk has been clearing a path in contrast to every other in English-language fiction, one which appears to observe a rigorous inner logic concerning the confinements of style and gender alike. That logic, now her signature, has been considered one of purgation. The trilogy that Define inaugurated (adopted by Transit and Kudos) scrubbed away plot to foreground pitiless remark of how we signify, justify, and unwittingly betray ourselves to others. Every of those lauded novels is a gallery of human varieties wherein the writer-narrator, Faye, wanders; discovering herself the recipient of different individuals’s talkative unburdening, she merely notices—a noticing that, in its acuity and present for condensed expression, is something however easy. Cusk’s follow-up, 2021’s Second Place, is a psychodrama about creative manufacturing that sacrifices life like world making for the starkness of fable.
Now, in Parade, the ingredient to be swept away is character itself. Gustave Flaubert as soon as notoriously commented that he needed to write down “a e book about nothing”; Cusk desires to write down a e book about nobody. No extra identities, no extra social roles, even no extra imperatives of the physique—a clearing of the bottom that has, as Cusk insists, specific urgency for writing by ladies, who’ve at all times needed to confront the boundaries to their autonomy of their quests to assume and create. The query Parade poses is what, after such drastic removing, is left standing.
If this sounds summary, it ought to—Cusk’s purpose is abstraction itself. Parade units out to transcend the novel’s routine concretion, to undo our attachment to the soundness of selfhood and its social markers. We’re caught by our acquainted impulses; trapped inside social and familial patterns and scripts; compelled, repelled, or each by the tales of how we got here to be. What if one didn’t hear oneself, nauseatingly, in all the things one mentioned and did, however as an alternative heard one thing alien and new? That is Cusk’s destructive theology of the self, a need to think about lives completely unconditioned and undetermined, now not formed by historical past, tradition, and even psychological continuity—and due to this fact free from loss, and from loss’s twin, progress. It’s a radical program, and a solitary one.
To be concrete for a second: The e book is available in 4 titled models. Its strands aren’t a lot nested as layered, peeling aside in a single’s palms like one thing delicate and brittle. What binds them collectively is the recurring look of an artist named “G,” who’s remodeled in every half, generally taking a number of types in the identical unit. G may be male or feminine, alive or lifeless, within the foreground or the background, however G at all times, tellingly, gravitates towards visible types somewhat than literary types: Parade is in love with the promise of freedom from narrative and from causality that’s supplied by visible illustration. We stay exterior G, observing the determine from numerous distances, by no means with the intimacy of an “I” chatting with us. G is usually tethered to the historical past of artwork: Parade begins by describing G creating upside-down work (a transparent reference to the work of Georg Baselitz, although he goes unnamed); a later G is palpably derived from Louise Bourgeois, the topic of an exhibition that figures in two totally different moments within the novel. But G tends to drift free of those tethers, which threaten to specify what Cusk prefers to render abstractly.
Cusk imagines a sequence of situations for G, usually because the maker of artworks seen and mentioned by others with alarm, admiration, or blasé art-world sophistication. When the shape-shifting G strikes into the foreground, shards of private life floor. As a male painter, G makes nude portraits of his spouse that lurch into grotesquerie, imprisoning her whereas gaining him fame. As a feminine painter, she finds herself, as if by some sort of darkish magic, encumbered with a husband and youngster. One other G abandons fiction for filmmaking, refusing the knowingness of language for the unselved innocence of the digital camera: “He needed merely to file.” No matter adjustments in every avatar—G’s gender; G’s historic second; whether or not we share G’s ideas, see G via their intimates, or merely stand in entrance of G’s work—the variations evaporate within the dry ambiance that prevails in Parade. G, whoever the determine is, desires to liberate their artwork of selfhood. So we get not tales however fragmented capsule biographies, written with an uncanny, beyond-the-grave neutrality, every of them capturing an individual untying themselves from the world, removing jobs, lovers, households.
Individuals on their approach out of their selves: That is what pursuits Cusk. From a person named Thomas who has simply resigned his educating job, placing in danger his household funds in addition to his spouse’s occupation as a poet, we hear this: “I appear to be doing loads of issues lately which can be out of character. I’m maybe popping out of character, he mentioned, like an actor does.” The tone is limpid, alienated from itself. “I don’t know what I’ll do or what I will probably be. For the primary time in my life I’m free.” Free not simply from the story, however even from the sound of himself, the Thomasness of Thomas.
Parade’s hollowed-out figures have the sober, disembodied grace of somebody who, rising from a purification ritual, awaits a promised epiphany. The feminine painter G, having left behind her daughter with a father whose sexualized pictures of the daughter as soon as lined the rooms of their residence, is herself left behind, sitting alone at midnight of her studio: That is so far as Cusk will carry her. They’ve departed, these individuals, been purged and shorn, however haven’t but arrived anyplace, they usually stretch out their palms in eager for the far shore and lapse into an austere, between-worlds silence. Cusk observes an much more disciplined tact than she did in Define. If remorse lurks of their escapes—about time wasted, individuals discarded, uncertainty to return—Cusk received’t indulge it. She appears to be not describing her figures a lot as becoming a member of them, sharing their need, a sort of starvation for unreality, a craving for the empty, unmappable areas exterior id. The result’s an intensified asceticism. Her sentences are as exact as at all times, however stingless, the perimeters of irony sanded down.
What Cusk has relinquished, as if in a sort of penance, is her curiosity. Even at its most austere, her earlier work displayed a fascination with the expertise of encountering others. That need was not at all times distinguishable from gossip, and positively not freed from judgment, however was expressed in an openness to the eccentricities of others as a supply of hazard, delight, and revelation. These encounters appealed to a reader’s pleasure in each the teasing thriller of others and the methods they turn into knowable. In Parade, Cusk appears to seek out this former curiosity greater than somewhat vulgar, too invested in what she calls right here “the pathos of id.”
Nothing illustrates this new flatness higher than “The Diver,” Parade’s third part. A gaggle of well-connected art-world individuals—a museum director, a biographer, a curator, an array of students—gathers for dinner in an unnamed German metropolis after the primary day of a significant retrospective exhibition of the Louise Bourgeois–like G. The opening has been spoiled, nevertheless, by an incident: A person has dedicated suicide within the exhibition’s galleries by leaping from an atrium walkway. (It is without doubt one of the novel’s only a few incidents, and it happens discreetly offstage.) The diners gather their ideas after their derailed day, ruminating on the connections between the suicide and the artwork amid which it came about, on the urge to leap out of our self-imposed restraints—out of our very embodiment.
Their dialog is indifferent, a bit shocked, however nonetheless expansive: These are practiced, skilled talkers. The scene can be unusually colorless. In discussing the starvation to lose an id, every speaker has already been divested of their very own, and the result’s a language that sounds nearer to the textureless theory-Esperanto of museum wall textual content. The director weighs in: “A few of G’s items, she mentioned, additionally utilise this high quality of suspension in attaining disembodiment, which for me at instances appears the furthest one can go in representing the physique itself.” Another person takes a flip: “The wrestle, he mentioned, which is usually a direct fight, between the seek for completeness and the need to create artwork due to this fact turns into a core a part of the artist’s improvement.”
It’s politely distanced, this after-suicide dinner in its barely specified upper-bourgeois setting, and the entire company are very like-minded. The interlude generates no friction of ethical analysis and conveys no satiric view of the quietly distressed, professionally established figures who theorize about artwork and loss of life. What one misses right here is the constitutive irony of the Define trilogy, the sense that these individuals is likely to be giving themselves away to our prurient eyes and ears. One desires to ask any of Parade’s figures what anguish or panic or rage lies behind their need to stop being an individual—what wrestle received them right here.
If Parade feels too pallid to carry a reader’s consideration, that’s as a result of it tends to withstand answering these questions. However abstraction’s maintain on Cusk isn’t fairly full, not but, and he or she has one reply nonetheless to offer: You bought right here since you had been mothered. The e book comes alive when Cusk turns to the mother-child relationship—a core preoccupation of hers—and transforms it into an all-encompassing concept of why id hampers and hurts, an issue now of personhood itself as a lot as of the constraints that motherhood locations on ladies. Each considered one of Parade’s situations options moms, fleeing and being fled. Between mom and youngster is the inescapable agony of reciprocal creation. The mom weaves for her youngster a self; the kid glues the masks of maternity onto the mom’s face. They can’t assist eager to run from what they’ve every made, regardless of the ache that flight exacts on the opposite. And so, pulling at and away from one another, mom and youngster study the toughest fact: Each escape is purchased on the expense of wrestle and loss for each the self and another person. Cusk is, as at all times, robust; she insists on the price.
That is the place Parade betrays some signal of turbulence beneath its detachment. The novel’s concluding part begins with the funeral of a mom, of whom we hear this, narrated within the collective “we” of her kids: “The coffin was surprising, and this should at all times be the case, whether or not or not one disliked being confined to the information as a lot as our mom had.” A knotty feeling emerges on this strand, sharp and humorous—the indignant rush of wants caught within the act of being denied, each the necessity for the mom and the must be achieved along with her. It’s the closest Parade involves an uncovered nerve. We each need and detest the specificity of our selfhood. Cusk understands the implicit, plaintive, and aggressive cry of the kid: Describe me, inform me what I’m, so I can later refuse it! That’s the common job of moms, and in addition of novelists—to explain us and so encase us. By Cusk’s lights, we should always study to do with out each; freedom awaits on the opposite facet.
It might be, although, that the anguish of the mother-child bind feels extra alive than the world that comes after selfhood. The issue is just not that Cusk has hassle discovering a language ample to her concept of the burdens of id—the issue could also be as an alternative that she has discovered that language, and it’s clear certainly, scoured so freed from attachments as to turn into translucent. Parade desires to exchange the standard enticements of fiction—individuals and the story of their destinies—with the illumination of pure chance. As such, the novel appears designed to impress calls for that it received’t fulfill. Be vivid! we’d wish to say to Cusk. Be indignant; be savage; be humorous; be actual. Be an individual. To which her response appears to be: Is that what you need to need?
This text seems within the July/August 2024 print version with the headline “A Novel With out Characters.”
If you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.