Are we again to the darkish ages when ladies have been handled like their sole goal in life was to get married and have youngsters?
I’m not that shocked, contemplating the Supreme Courtroom has taken away ladies’s proper to determine what is sweet for their very own our bodies.
Now, this: an op-ed in Newsweek claims Taylor Swift is a nasty function mannequin for younger ladies for being 34, childless, and single.
Conservative author John Mac Ghlionn took low-cost pictures at Taylor Swift’s relationship historical past as if having 12 boyfriends means something. And that’s after he known as her an financial powerhouse.
Taylor Swift: Financial Powerhouse
John Mac Ghlionn calls Taylor Swift an financial powerhouse of epic proportions. And you know the way misogynists assault: they’ll first be condescending after which say one thing silly. The one distinction right here is that Newsweek revealed it.
Taylor Swift’s largest crime, in response to John Mac Ghlionn, is that she remained single and childless at 34 and had 12 boyfriends all through her relationship historical past.
He even ventured into her current relationship with American soccer participant Travis Kelce, who is similar age, childless, and single, but no one questions his “morals.” He additionally thinks the couple gained’t final. Is he a journalist or a celeb gossipmonger?
Taylor, most likely essentially the most hardworking feminine musical artist of her technology, who instructions a fandom we haven’t seen for a really very long time, is all the time a goal of misogynists who can’t fathom her success and affect, not solely in popular culture however in society at giant.
She has influenced younger voters to register and vote they usually did. If that wasn’t factor, I don’t know what’s.
When males like John Mac Ghlionn can’t say something a few girl’s accomplishments — Taylor Swift has many — they go private. The assault lies largely in Taylor’s decisions.
Misogynistic Assaults
Let’s get to the gritty particulars of why John Mac Ghlionn believes Taylor Swift isn’t function mannequin for younger ladies.
Extra particularly, is she function mannequin for younger ladies within the U.S. and past? Quite a few items have been written explaining why she is; I wish to provide some pushback. — John Mac Ghlionn
He claims that at 34, Taylor Swift ought to already be married with children. Many males like John share this view about ladies. Are these the very type of males who secretly want ladies like Taylor Swift would even take into account relationship them?
Swift’s extremely publicized romantic life has been a supply of prime tabloid fodder for years. She has dated quite a few high-profile males — at the very least a dozen — together with the singers Harry Kinds and Joe Jonas, the actor Jake Gyllenhaal, and, extra just lately, the American soccer participant Travis Kelce. This revolving door of relationships could replicate the conventional relationship experiences of many younger ladies in immediately’s world, but it surely additionally raises questions on stability, dedication, and even love itself. Ought to we encourage younger ladies to see the “Swift customary” because the norm, one thing to aspire to? Or ought to we be selling one thing somewhat extra, let’s assume, healthful? Would any loving father or mother studying this need their daughter thus far 12 totally different males within the span of only a few years? This isn’t an assault on Swift; it’s a legitimate query that’s value asking. — John Mac Ghlionn
Then, he known as Taylor Swift a hypocrite due to her views about patriarchy whereas she dates highly effective celebrities. Once more, he has a fetish for Taylor Swift’s relationship historical past.
Fact is, relationship is advanced. Ought to Taylor Swift have stayed in a nasty relationship simply so males like John take into account her function mannequin?
Understanding Taylor Swift’s Affect
Has John Mac Ghlionn actually understood Taylor Swift’s songs?
Youtube
I’m not shocked {that a} 7-year-old girl may articulate it extra as to why Taylor Swift is an effective function mannequin. This seven-year-old sums it up as “lady energy.”
And that’s the actual drawback John Mac Ghlionn has towards Taylor Swift: it’s about “lady energy.” In fact, misogynists don’t need ladies empowered.
Who celebrated when SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade? Largely males, as a result of for the final 50 years, Roe v. Wade empowered ladies to determine what they will do with their our bodies.
Closing Phrases
Taylor Swift will proceed to dominate the music world.
I by no means heard her say that she’s aiming to be a task mannequin to anybody. She needs to sing, write, and play her music.
Her message is just not solely about lady energy but additionally about sharing along with her followers that it’s okay to be enormously profitable, and it’s okay to depart a nasty relationship as a result of settling is worse than not being in a relationship.
Taylor Swift has completed greater than males like John Mac Ghlionn of their lifetime.
Even Tennis legend Martina Navratilova known as out John Mac Ghlionn, who has since deleted or made his X account non-public. Navratilova additionally identified within the replies: “Taylor by no means claimed she was a task mannequin.”
Navratilova additionally identified within the replies: “Taylor by no means claimed she was a task mannequin.”
X
As for Newsweek their excuse for printing that “trash” is that they wish to have the dialog and that too can also be lots of BS.
When reached for remark, a spokesperson for Newsweek advised Billboard: “At Newsweek, we’re dedicated to providing a platform for a variety of opinions that replicate the varied views that exist inside our society. Like all media organizations, we publish opinion items from numerous contributors, every bringing distinctive viewpoints. We consider this strategy encourages public discourse and upholds our dedication to journalistic integrity and the pursuit of fact.” — Billboard
Do you suppose Taylor Swift is an effective function mannequin for younger ladies or not?
Thanks for studying.
—
This put up was beforehand revealed on MEDIUM.COM.
***
You might also like these posts on The Good Males Mission:
Be part of The Good Males Mission as a Premium Member immediately.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Males Mission with NO ADS.
A $50 annual membership provides you an all entry go. You will be part of each name, group, class and group.
A $25 annual membership provides you entry to at least one class, one Social Curiosity group and our on-line communities.
A $12 annual membership provides you entry to our Friday calls with the writer, our on-line group.
Register New Account
Want extra data? A whole listing of advantages is right here.
—
Photograph credit score: iStock.com