The 2010 film Valentine’s Day just isn’t significantly memorable, however it does include a quick, pointed little bit of eating humor that also endures. Jason (performed by Topher Grace) and Liz (Anne Hathaway) are at a elaborate Beverly Hills restaurant for an early-in-the-game date on—you guessed it—Valentine’s Day. It’s not going properly. You see, this place has a protracted communal desk, so poor Jason and Liz are crammed in among the many lots, one among a gazillion dates, all lined up like Noah’s animals. On one aspect of them a pair is loudly, vigorously, endlessly making out. A person sitting subsequent to Liz accuses Jason of ingesting his water, then hits on Liz. Jason apologetically calls the place a “zoo,” and he’s not fallacious. In romantic-comedy logic, each couple has an impediment to beat, and the desk, for now, is theirs. The scene works as a result of the issue is broadly relatable: Isn’t consuming this near different folks terrible?
But a decade and a half later—after the unhappy, pandemic-era plexiglass dividers went up and got here down, after the surgeon normal declared an “epidemic of loneliness and isolation,” and because the restaurant enterprise has entered a time of each excessive demand and dangerously skinny margins—right here we’re, being squeezed collectively once more. Restaurant designers in New York, Houston, Philadelphia, and Asheville, North Carolina, instructed me they’re getting new requests for communal setups, in eating places from meals courts as much as and together with the sorts of locations the place diners spend lots of of {dollars} and reservations are not possible to safe. Maty’s, which earned a spot on principally each potential best-new-restaurant checklist after opening final 12 months in Miami, has two lengthy communal tables in its ethereal, milk-colored eating room. There’s additionally one at Kann, a Portland, Oregon, restaurant from the High Chef alumnus Gregory Gourdet, although you’ll need to take my phrase for it as a result of the place has precisely zero accessible reservations. Ambra, one of the vital sought-after eating experiences in Philadelphia, doesn’t have non-public seats in any respect—only a chef’s counter and a good-looking, candlelit communal desk, described by one reviewer as “a wine-, truffle-, and caviar-fueled celebration with 9 new pals.” It and different sizzling eating places—in New Orleans, the Bay Space, New York, and possibly a metropolis close to you—are making the communal desk not only a design alternative however a central ingredient of the eating expertise.
To grasp why, it first helps to grasp simply how bizarre this present second is for eating places. Wholesale provides, actual property, and labor are any restaurant’s three greatest line gadgets, and they’re all way more costly than they’ve been in latest historical past: In keeping with knowledge supplied by the Nationwide Restaurant Affiliation, meals prices are up greater than 20 p.c from 2019, and restaurant wages are up greater than 30 p.c. Greater than half of small-business house owners who run eating places reported in a single survey that they couldn’t pay their April hire. A couple of out of each three eating places wasn’t worthwhile in 2023, and 43 p.c of restaurateurs report that they’re nonetheless carrying debt from the pandemic.
Eating places usually have two levers they will pull to maximise earnings: Elevate costs, or convey extra our bodies out and in on a given night time. Provided that many diners nowadays are exceptionally cost-sensitive, the second possibility is clearly preferable—particularly as a result of curiosity in consuming out is larger than ever, as B. Hudson Riehle, the senior vice chairman for analysis on the Nationwide Restaurant Affiliation, instructed me (and as anybody who’s tried to make a reservation currently is aware of intuitively).
Communal tables match extra folks, they usually could make service simpler and sooner. Even when $100 entrees relaxation upon them, they evince a extra informal environment, which suggests extra informal service, “which is less complicated to execute with much less workers,” Hillary Dixler Canavan, Eater’s former restaurant editor, instructed me. And communal seating “creates flexibility,” Riehle instructed me. Lance Saunders, the director of design at Philadelphia’s Stokes Structure + Design, was a bit of extra candid: “You’re cramming as many seats as potential,” he mentioned. “That’s what restaurateurs like: Extra seats equals more cash.”
That is true. However eating places don’t like alienating their prospects. And fortunate for them so far, diners are, perhaps surprisingly, not revolting en masse; eating places “wouldn’t be doing it at scale if it was completely dangerous for enterprise,” Dixler Canavan instructed me. Individuals, not less than a few of them, appear to really wish to eat with strangers.
Meals folks love to speak about how eating places convey folks collectively. However non-public tables achieve this solely up to a degree. They could place diners throughout the identical few sq. ft, however they cease in need of what teachers name “commensality,” from the Latin com (“collectively”) and mensa (“desk”). “On essentially the most primary degree, commensality is about consuming and ingesting collectively, however it’s way over only a bodily act,” the archaeologist Susan Pollack writes. “Underpinning commensality is co-presence”—being collectively. Nearly everybody agrees that commensality is a essentially good factor: Within the scientific literature, it has been related to stronger bonds and higher well being; in eating places, it could possibly create what Dixler Canavan calls “these moments of serendipity and neighborhood,” and what Cami Jetta, a Brooklyn restaurateur, calls “the magic of sharing house.”
Jetta’s restaurant is actually known as Dinner Social gathering. The design is homey, the menu is ready, and the servers earnestly consult with company as “household.” The schtick was partly born of necessity, Jetta instructed me: The house is tiny (roughly 500 sq. ft), and the kitchen is smaller than many dwelling kitchens—too cramped to cook dinner meals to order. Plus, Jetta needed sturdy vintage furnishings, and the tables she was discovering had been huge. However the conceit can also be ideological; she opened in 2021, “popping out of isolation,” and needed to create a restaurant that replicated a sense she hadn’t had in a very long time—of gathering round a well-used desk in an area that appears like an condo. Her prospects apparently needed this, too: The place has been reliably onerous to discover a seat in because it opened.
Meals courts, bars, and occasional outlets have after all lengthy provided shared seating, as have eating places in elements of the world with totally different consuming traditions and social mores, significantly in Europe and East Asia. And this isn’t the primary time that communal eating has been modern in American eating places. Benihana, which seated as much as eight strangers round a hibachi grill, was a sensation within the Sixties; the Beatles and Muhammad Ali reportedly ate (not collectively!) on the restaurant’s Manhattan flagship. Within the ’80s, as high quality eating grew to become extra informal, and eating alone much less bizarre, white-tablecloth-y locations started serving their full menu on the bar. Within the ’90s and 2000s, coffee-shop tradition—and laptop computer tradition—turned the lengthy shared desk into a spot the place you would possibly spend your complete day.
About twenty years in the past, communal tables additionally had a second—not coincidentally throughout the Nice Recession, when eating places had been making an attempt to decrease prices. They weren’t universally beloved. The Chicago Tribune named communal eating one of many 10 worst eating tendencies of the 2000s, extra annoying than molecular gastronomy or $40 entrees. A New York Put up article from 2012 headlined “Don’t Sit So Near Me!” leads with a diner who was seated at a communal desk and selected to go away after a spherical of drinks. “Communal tables make me suppose ‘informal, enjoyable dialog over hearty, tasty meals,’” he instructed the Put up. “Forty bucks an entree says to me: ‘high quality eating.’”
I get it. The factor about different folks is that generally they’re extraordinarily annoying. In American tradition, there’s nothing extra luxurious than house to unfold out, and in eating tradition, there’s nothing extra high quality than having each facet of the expertise tailor-made to you. Non-public tables are a lot newer than communal ones, however they’re central to our understanding of what a restaurant, particularly a pleasant one, is.
The primary institutions to be known as eating places had been virtually like spas, as Katie Rawson and Elliott Shore write in Eating Out: A World Historical past of Eating places—quiet, stunning, stress-free environments that served restorative broths to single diners at particular person tables. This was in marked distinction to “the communal or utilitarian experiences” that had beforehand outlined the way in which Europeans dined out, at inns, taverns, coffeehouses, and tables d’hote, which served a single meal at a single time at a shared desk. “One of many nice improvements of the restaurant is that it’s about you, the individual eating,” Rawson and Shore write.
Probably the most seductive lie eating places inform is that the shopper has the management: You go into an area you’ve picked, sit with folks you got here with, select what you need from a wide range of choices, tip what you need. The management is illusory, and restricted, however it’s central to the expertise. “So not being the grasp of your personal little desk,” Dixler Canavan, the restaurant professional, instructed me, “pisses some folks off.”
The analysis on commensality has an attention-grabbing caveat. When it’s coercive—say, in institutional settings, or throughout instances when political repression has maligned or even criminalized non-public eating—most of the salutary and social results of communal consuming are negated. Everybody needs to be the boss of their very own consuming expertise, as a result of consuming is intimate. As Håkan Jönsson, an affiliate professor in meals expertise and cultural sciences on the College of Lund, in Sweden, instructed me, it’s “essentially the most social factor we do, however it’s one of the vital non-public issues we do. After we are consuming and ingesting, our our bodies are actually open to the encompassing world; we’re giving ourselves as much as the encompassing world. That’s a really delicate factor to do.” Consuming is private, bodily, and a bit of gross; it exposes among the basest weirdnesses and most embarrassing realities of getting a physique. Doing it in entrance of strangers is an act of vulnerability.
However perhaps now co-presence is sounding a bit of higher, and corporeal vulnerability rather less scary. A couple of days earlier than I talked to Dinner Social gathering’s Jetta, I ate at her restaurant alone: simply me, my successful persona, and a telephone at 4 p.c. I sat at a protracted desk with six different folks—all {couples}, two birthdays—and, after about quarter-hour of quiet, discovered a solution to have interaction within the type of straightforward, low-stakes dialog you’ve with somebody you don’t know: about sports activities, and jobs, and the state of Rhode Island; earthquakes and indoor malls; different eating places and what they’re like. It felt heat and pleasantly aimless. I wasn’t frantically catching up with a good friend I hadn’t seen in weeks or making an attempt to make a brand new one; I wasn’t even making an attempt to be spectacular in any method. I couldn’t keep in mind the final time I’d talked for therefore lengthy with somebody with whom I had nothing or nobody in frequent, and who wasn’t additionally chopping my hair. I used to be by no means going to see these folks once more, however for 2 hours we had been a unit. It was solely when the time got here to sing “Glad Birthday” that I noticed I didn’t know anybody’s names.
Whenever you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
