American Bloods—what a title! Hammering out settlement on the that means of American is difficult sufficient, however consider blood—our valuable bodily fluid, inclined to poisoning within the fevered fascist creativeness—and a brawl would possibly simply be brewing. Should you’ve found out that Blood is a surname, the subtitle of John Kaag’s new guide (The Untamed Dynasty That Formed a Nation) might probably defuse the state of affairs, however it too is provocative: If the Blood dynasty formed the nation, why have we by no means heard of it?
Kaag, a philosophy professor on the College of Massachusetts at Lowell, lives in a home on the banks of the Harmony River that was in-built 1745 by a colonial named Josiah Blood. A decade later, in that very same home, Thaddeus Blood was born. He was on the scene with a musket on April 19, 1775, when the “shot heard around the world” was fired; as an previous man, he was interviewed concerning the expertise by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Kaag noticed that the Blood clan would supply him an opportunity to discover huge concepts in relation to particular person lives, to start out near residence and increase outward, weaving collectively personalities, cultural historical past, and philosophy in an try to ask not simply the place we got here from however the place we’re going.
He has made a behavior of mixing philosophy with first-person narratives of a confessional forged. In American Philosophy: A Love Story (2016), he tells us about his first two marriages whereas communing together with his “mental heroes,” the New England thinkers Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and William James. In Mountain climbing With Nietzsche: On Turning into Who You Are (2018), he treks up and down an alp or two with the German iconoclast. The brand new challenge is far more formidable. Working with an even bigger forged on an expansive stage, he’s hoping to unlock secrets and techniques of Americanness. No marvel the pressure reveals.
Kaag units out to hint the nation’s development (and “excruciating rising pains”) as refracted via “one in every of America’s first and most expansive pioneer households,” whose lineage occurs to run straight via his household residence. Listed within the index of a privately revealed family tree he finds in his home are hundreds of Bloods, from Aaron to Zebulon. Along with Josiah and Thaddeus, Kaag plucks out a handful of others, curious characters born between 1618 and 1838, who discovered themselves within the thick of roiling historical past or crossed paths with well-known American thinkers.
Kaag makes the case that, “not like many different extra seen or iconic American dynasties” (he mentions the Cabots, Lowells, Astors, Roosevelts), the Bloods
constantly, and with exceptional regularity, reveal a selected frontier ethos: their family tree tracks what Henry David Thoreau referred to as “wildness,” an unique untamed spirit that might recede within the making of America however by no means be extinguished completely. The USA might have been based on “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” however it was at all times shot via with one thing unbalanced, heedless, undomesticated, fearful.
The making of America meant pushing again the frontier, establishing civilization the place earlier than, because the Puritan William Bradford testified, there had been “a hideous and desolate wilderness, full of untamed beasts & wild males.” Kaag asserts that New England colonials drew a transparent, unwavering line between the civilized and the wild, however he believes that the Blood dynasty shared a extra difficult ethos: Its members “frequently explored life and its extremes,” absorbing the lesson that “human existence was not cleanly demarcated however unshakably wild.”
Hardly alone in wanting, simply now, to weigh the danger of mayhem in America, he asks, “What untamed tales lie beneath the pores and skin of our roughly well-functioning society? How persistent is the wildness that after outlined our nation?” The solutions, he warns, received’t be tidy, although he can’t resist assigning conveniently emblematic roles to his small pattern of Zelig-like Bloods.
Bare opportunism guided the primary determine in Kaag’s guide: Thomas Blood, who was not American however is essentially the most infamous particular person to bear the title. In 1671, he tried to steal the Crown Jewels from the Tower of London. A rogue in addition to a thief, Thomas units the tone for the American department of the household, which was began by his nephews, who had been among the many early New England settlers, arriving someday within the 1630s. By mid-century, Robert Blood had established a farm on a 3,000-acre tract simply north of Harmony, then very a lot the frayed fringe of civilization. A “troublesome” man, Robert was an excellent citizen when it suited him and a renegade when taxes fell due. He nonetheless understood that one of the best protection in opposition to exterior threats was neighborly cooperation. The cautious dance he did with native authority, in Kaag’s telling, “presages in miniature the political dynamics” because the colonies started to insurgent in opposition to the British Crown.
The previous favorites Emerson and Thoreau, Transcendentalists who championed American cultural independence and the primacy of the person soul, take the stage as Kaag fast-forwards roughly a century to deal with Bloods intersecting with homegrown ferment. Robert’s great-great-grandson Thaddeus made a permanent impression on Emerson, who admired the uncommon braveness that the veteran of the skirmish on the Outdated North Bridge had displayed as a younger minuteman. Kaag suggests (although definitely doesn’t show) that Emerson’s dialog with Thaddeus in 1835 was the catalyst for what he calls Emerson’s personal “acts of riot”: two speeches delivered within the subsequent a number of years, “The American Scholar” and the bombshell “Divinity Faculty Handle,” wherein he renounced all organized faith (and specifically what he elsewhere derided as “corpse-cold Unitarianism”).
“The American Scholar” referred to as for a brand new sort of educated American, an energetic, engaged mental boldly embracing the rough-and-tumble of a brand new nation—what a pleasure to see the 34-year-old Emerson roll up his sleeves and resolve to “run eagerly into this resounding tumult,” to take his place “within the ring to undergo and to work”! And but Kaag’s subsequent Blood, Perez, son of Thaddeus, shrank from the tumult. A recluse and an beginner astronomer, Perez spent his time in his woodshed, seated on a swivel chair, peering on the heavens via a telescope. Undeterred, Kaag finds a strategy to match him into his exploration of wildness by claiming that Perez had a “lasting and profound” friendship with Thoreau and helped him “outline his conception of human freedom.” Within the first sentence of “Strolling” (an essay revealed on this journal, posthumously, in 1862), Thoreau associates wildness with “absolute freedom”—as distinct from “a freedom and tradition merely civil.” Based on Kaag, each Perez and Thoreau freed themselves from “the tawdry distractions of contemporary life,” and the eccentric previous stargazer impressed Thoreau “to see the inside, noble type of a seemingly widespread man.”
The resounding tumult returns with James Clinton Blood, a co-founder and the primary mayor of Lawrence, Kansas, and a passing acquaintance of John Brown, whose gory assaults on militant pro-slavery settlers helped give “Bloody Kansas” its title. James had gone west as a part of an abolitionist scheme to maintain the territory from changing into a slave state, and acted as an agent and a scout, shopping for up land from Native tribes. He survived the Lawrence Bloodbath of 1863 (when Accomplice guerrillas killed some 150 unarmed males and boys), and within the postwar a long time “fortunately watched the frontier city civilize itself.”
James is supposed to be consultant of the various Bloods who participated within the settlement of the American West and who “got here to know the border as a paradoxical house, the place essentially the most vicious of beings is also essentially the most weak.” I don’t know whom Kaag is referring to in that final clause or what he means. He’s keenly conscious that we are able to’t ponder “the bleeding of Kansas” except we reckon with the calamitous battle fought over the ethical abomination of slavery and in addition the genocidal persecution of the Native inhabitants. In earlier chapters, he mentions a couple of of the enslaved folks purchased and bought by numerous 18th-century Bloods, and right here he describes the dismal destiny of the Plains tribes who had been cheated out of their land or pushed off or just exterminated. We by no means study, although, whether or not James’s land offers had been made in good religion or how different untamed Bloods fared on the brand new frontier. This appears the unsuitable second to fudge: The tales we inform about how, precisely, the Wild West civilized itself shade our concepts about who we’re as a nation.
American Bloods isn’t a panoramic mental historical past or perhaps a conjoined narrative. Nor does Kaag substantiate the declare that the Bloods “circulated via every period, an animating pressure of American historical past, slightly below the floor.” Don’t let the flamboyant blood metaphor distract you: Heredity can not plausibly account for the persistence of an ideology or a spirit over a span of centuries. As a substitute of telling an unbroken story, Kaag has assembled a sequence of portraits, some extra partaking than others, the diploma of curiosity decided by which nice males are adjoining to the male Blood in query. At one level, he alludes to what he calls “a largely forgotten counternarrative: the Blood ladies.” However his solely substantive contribution to that counternarrative is to current us with the charismatic ladies’s-rights advocate Victoria Woodhull, who married Colonel James Harvey Blood, a veteran of the Union Military and a dedicated spiritualist. Kaag calls Woodhull “arguably essentially the most well-known and scandalous of the American Bloods,” and it’s completely apparent why he would need to undertake her: Excessive and mercurial, she’s a great embodiment of many divergent, unconventional responses to the trauma of the Civil Warfare.
Victoria met James in St. Louis within the mid-1860s. Twenty-six years previous and strikingly stunning, she was working as a medium and a “non secular doctor” when James consulted her, searching for therapy for wounds suffered in battle. She fell right into a trance and introduced that their destinies had been linked. James preferred the thought: Obeying the spirits, they left St. Louis and their spouses behind. The brand new marriage lasted barely a decade—however it was some decade.
In New York, the soothsaying of this Blood-by-marriage morphed into funding recommendation (lapped up by an aged Cornelius Vanderbilt), and Victoria made “an utter fortune from her wildness,” as Kaag places it. She based a brokerage home and a crusading weekly newspaper, and waged energetic campaigns free of charge love and equal rights. Kaag concedes that Victoria’s “strategies” as a healer and fortune teller “had been fraudulent—which is to say too wild for perception.” He doesn’t attempt to make sense of her dishonesty, or condemn the blatant hypocrisy of her remaining incarnation: Having ditched James, she married a wealthy English banker, renouncing radicalism to safe for herself “the standing and success that girls of earlier generations couldn’t have envisioned.” Kaag leaves it to the reader to attach her successive self-reinventions with the bigger Blood narrative.
Having toured this gallery of “untamed beasts” exhibiting so many various shades of American wildness, we’d ask what wild means to Kaag himself. I’m undecided. However it’s clear that one necessary step in his quest to create space for the “contradictions and tensions and paradoxes” of every day life has been coming to phrases with Benjamin Blood, a promiscuously proficient poet-philosopher. Benjamin’s rhapsodic mysticism, eccentricity, and primal vigor had been significantly interesting to William James. This Blood taught Kaag’s hero that “the key of Being,” in James’s phrases, “isn’t the darkish immensity past information, however at residence, this facet, beneath the toes, and neglected by information.”
A sensible idealist, high-minded but of the folks (he’s been referred to as “a mystic of the commonplace”), Benjamin was born in 1832 in upstate New York. Over the course of his 86 years, he was an inventor, a gambler, a gymnast, and a boxer, in addition to a poet, metaphysician, and compulsive author of letters to the editor—in brief, the antithesis of a library-bound thinker. Dissatisfied with philosophizing, he informed James that he “felt compelled to enter extra energetic life,” to work 10 hours a day in a neighborhood mill. “I’ve worn out many types,” he boasted, “and am cosmopolitan, liberal to others, and contented with myself.” His mental pursuits, Kaag writes, needs to be regarded “as an afterthought to motion, the hint of a life lived as totally as attainable.”
Deeply impressed by a self-published pamphlet, The Anaesthetic Revelation and the Gist of Philosophy (1874), James struck up a correspondence with the writer and ultimately volunteered to attempt to make him well-known. He saved his phrase: The final essay he ever wrote, “A Pluralistic Mystic” (1910), is a hymn to Benjamin’s unusual advantage.
James directs our consideration to a exceptional passage wherein Benjamin explains that “the universe is wild—recreation flavored as a hawk’s wing.” Celebrating the contingent and the unfinished, Benjamin declares that “nature is miracle all. She is aware of no legal guidelines; the identical returns not, save to convey the totally different.” We will by no means totally grasp actuality; our understanding, in Benjamin’s phrases, is “ever not fairly.” Or as James himself insisted, uneasy about what appeared an oppressively bureaucratic and professionalized twentieth century, “There is no such thing as a full generalization, no complete perspective.”
Kaag warmly welcomes the thought of the unfinished, of a cobbled-together and eternally unfinished worldview; he finds it irritating but in addition encouraging. On the identical time, he can’t resist imposing an overarching unity. Wanting to wrap issues up neatly, he claims that Benjamin Blood’s philosophy of open-ended, open-hearted pluralism—and of energetic engagement within the wider world—one way or the other “silently guided the Blood household from its very inception.” And but the considered the entire crew, from Thomas to Perez to Victoria, all wedded to a single ethos hardly sits nicely with Benjamin’s perception that “the genius of being is whimsical fairly than constant.”
What does this must do with America? Kaag is telling us that wildness is with us at all times, yesterday and immediately, even the damaging, corrupt, fraudulent varieties, however that beneficent wildness makes room for exploration, new concepts, new methods of being. A extra excellent union is at all times attainable—although ever not fairly.
This text seems within the June 2024 print version with the headline “The Wild Blood Dynasty.”
If you purchase a guide utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
