Did John Steinbeck Unfairly Applicable a Lady’s Work?
It’s possible, however not at all sure, that in Could 1938, the writers John Steinbeck and Sanora Babb met in a café close to Arvin, California. Each had been on the town to chronicle the plight of migrants who had been flooding the state to flee the decimation of the Mud Bowl. Each had been writing fiction about it—Steinbeck had deserted two novels on the topic earlier that 12 months, whereas Babb had obtained an enthusiastic response from Random Home for the opening chapters of her novel in progress, Whose Names Are Unknown. And each had been linked to Tom Collins, a staffer on the Farm Safety Administration (FSA), a federal company offering assist to the migrants. To Steinbeck, Collins was a good friend and a passkey to the migrant expertise. To Babb, he was a mentor and supervisor; she had volunteered to doc dwelling circumstances within the camps.
What occurred subsequent is in some methods clear as day, in others frustratingly fuzzy. The clear half is a story of profound literary unfairness: Steinbeck obtained FSA discipline notes, compiled largely (however not completely) from Babb’s observations and interviews, after which he started a punishing 100-day writing dash to provide The Grapes of Wrath, the foundational American novel in regards to the Nice Melancholy. Babb’s guide, delivered later, can be scotched. The Random Home co-founder Bennett Cerf alerted Babb that she was late to the end line in August 1939. “What rotten luck for you that ‘The Grapes of Wrath’ mustn’t solely have come out earlier than your guide was submitted however ought to have so swept the nation!” Cerf wrote. “Clearly, one other guide presently about precisely the identical topic can be a tragic anticlimax!”
Right here’s the fuzzy half: Over time, an understandably annoyed Babb would insist that she, not Collins, had personally handed over the experiences to Steinbeck—an act that may make his appropriation look extra brazen and private. “Tom requested me to provide him my notes,” Babb would write 40 years after that alleged café assembly. “I did. Naïve me.” It doesn’t seem that Steinbeck ever wrote about assembly Babb, and even talked about her by title, although it’s believable that two diligent reporters on the identical beat would wish to evaluate notes.
By Iris Jamahl Dunkle
Fuzzier nonetheless is the query of how a lot of Grapes was written on the again of the FSA notes, how a lot of that analysis was Babb’s—and the way a lot it issues. Her observations virtually definitely helped Steinbeck form his rendering of the migrants. Babb’s entries had been wealthy and thorough—having grown up on a failing farm within the Oklahoma panhandle, she was notably trusted by Collins to attach with the migrants. When Babb shared her jottings, straight or not directly, she was possible motivated by the urge to get their expertise throughout by means of no matter medium may assist them.
So what would you name the following fame of 1 novel and the preemptive burial of one other? Appropriation? Theft? Unhealthy timing? Sexism? Maybe, ultimately, it was merely proof of a merciless flaw of publishing: Generally its choice makers conclude—not all the time for good causes—that there isn’t room for a lot of tales about one main occasion. {That a} short-term judgment about what the market will bear can choke off a literary legacy and, to some extent, impoverish a tradition.
One advantage of Iris Jamahl Dunkle’s new biography, Driving Just like the Wind: The Lifetime of Sanora Babb, is that it retains Steinbeck off the stage for so long as potential. Regardless of Babb’s rotten luck, as Cerf put it, the editor’s snub wasn’t the defining ingredient of her life and profession. A devoted leftist, she’d revealed fiction and reportage in little magazines and journals reminiscent of New Lots, befriending working-class writers together with William Saroyan and Nelson Algren. She had an extended marriage to the Oscar-winning cinematographer James Wong Howe that generally bent however didn’t break underneath the strain of his work. And although Grapes derailed her profession, Babb by no means stopped mining her childhood for materials. In Oklahoma, Colorado, and Kansas, she’d skilled poverty, crop failures, and an absent dad; her mom struggled to maintain a bakery working whereas her father chased illusory desires as a gambler and semipro baseball participant. Wind highlights Babb’s dedication to chronicle such deprivation whereas writing her means out of it.
This private historical past, in accordance with Dunkle, goes a way towards explaining why Babb may need made the career-crippling choice to open-source her notes. “It’s important to perceive that Sanora Babb got here from a communist, liberal background—she was a community-based author,” Dunkle informed me over Zoom from UC Davis, the place she is a lecturer within the English division. “She was a part of a writers’ group for 40 years with Ray Bradbury,” {and professional} collaboration was baked into her ethos. “I don’t suppose she thought that Steinbeck would acceptable issues from her notes and that it could make it unattainable for her to publish her guide.”
Driving Just like the Wind doesn’t argue that Steinbeck plagiarized Babb, however quite asserts that he appropriated her writing with out credit score; it additionally means that the scope and perspective of The Grapes of Wrath didn’t grow to be clear to Steinbeck till he had these notes in hand. Dunkle quotes Steinbeck himself to point out that the sphere experiences commissioned by Collins (one of many individuals to whom Grapes was devoted) had been important to an genuine portrayal of his milieu: “Letter from Tom with very important data for use later. He’s good,” the writer wrote in his diary whereas toiling over his novel. “I would like these items. It’s precise and simply the factor that will likely be used in opposition to me if I’m flawed.”
Though Dunkle’s framing is backed by contemporary proof, some fuzziness persists. In his 2020 biography of Steinbeck, Mad on the World, William Souder expresses skepticism about whether or not Babb really met Steinbeck—or would have willingly handed over notes she was utilizing for her personal novel. Chatting with me on the cellphone from his dwelling in Minnesota, he deferred to Dunkle’s analysis (and Babb’s statements) on that time, however stated it’s troublesome to discern what materials of Babb’s was used, and the way.
Souder and different students have detected echoes of Babb’s notes in Grapes. Her observations in regards to the migrants’ “mortgage-lost farms, bank-claimed equipment and animals, dust-ruined acres” have the identical biblical cadence that Steinbeck mastered in his novel. Their descriptions of stillborn infants are comparable; each use creatures like bugs and turtles as metaphors for the migrants’ plight.
With out direct proof, nonetheless, a definitive hyperlink can’t be proved; each authors had been, in spite of everything, in the identical place on the identical time. “It’s actually arduous to disentangle issues and say, ‘Effectively, this concept comes from Steinbeck; this concept comes from Babb,’” Souder stated. “I feel that’s borderline unattainable.”
And Steinbeck had a minimum of as a lot proper to the topic. He had been writing about Mud Bowl migrants nicely earlier than assembly Babb; in 1936, he wrote dispatches on them for the San Francisco Information; that very same 12 months, he revealed In Doubtful Battle, a few California fruit-worker strike. “He’s a local of California,” Peter Van Coutren, an archivist on the Martha Heasley Cox Middle for Steinbeck Research at San Jose State College, informed me. “He’s a eager observer of what’s … taking place right here in California, and he’s on the lookout for a technique to promote his beliefs of equity, human rights, and human equality.”
For all of the parallels, a reader can be unlikely to mistake one novel for the opposite. Their plots rhyme, particularly within the latter chapters, which concern migrant households trapped and exploited by low-paying conglomerate farms. However the place Grapes is relentlessly symphonic and sometimes melodramatic, Unknown—which was lastly edited and launched 20 years in the past—is intimate and restrained, focusing acutely on the slow-motion erosion of the agrarian American dream in a sample of exploitation that the Mud Bowl solely intensified. Its portrait of an Oklahoma-panhandle neighborhood undone by mud storms, depicting miscarriage and suicide together with financial devastation, is visceral and honed, extra in step with Algren than Steinbeck.
Babb had a present for weaving collectively particular person desperation and systemic failure. In a superb part within the first half of Unknown, a household patriarch, Milt, contemplates the approaching climate and virtually wills it to avoid wasting his household:
He regarded on the edges of the sky, hoping for clouds or the steely haze that may imply early snow. Off to the northwest a financial institution of clouds lay simply darker than the sky, nonetheless like a fantastic animal ready to spring, exhibiting the sleepy fireplace of its eyes when the faint autumn lightning winked. It was distant and would spend its energy on different land. His wheat and that of each different prairie farm was ready within the floor for rain.
In his “rotten luck” letter, Cerf wrote to Babb that “the final third of your guide is so utterly like ‘The Grapes of Wrath’ that the households and characters may mainly be interchanged within the two.” That is precisely proper but in addition utterly misses the purpose: Collective experiences are, by their nature, shared, however Babb’s characterization of them was wholly her personal. And whereas Grapes chronicles the injustices that migrants confronted in California, Unknown reveals how farmers struggled with them in Oklahoma, bringing their dread and suspicions of authority westward.
Two writers with divergent kinds, each capturing a cataclysmic American occasion: It’s troublesome to imagine {the marketplace} didn’t have room for them each. “The excuse given by Cerf that the sphere was too crowded to carry one other novel of the identical appears flimsy at greatest,” Van Coutren, of the Steinbeck Middle, informed me. “So I think about there was another push for him to give you a purpose to dismiss her, and I see that dismissal … as, probably, as a result of she was a younger lady author who was simply getting began.”
That is Dunkle’s conclusion as nicely, and it’s an inexpensive one. The publishing trade might accommodate contemporaneous World Conflict II novels in regards to the Pacific Theater, together with From Right here to Eternity and The Caine Mutiny; Henry Roth’s Name It Sleep opened the door for Jewish American immigrant literature, quite than slamming it shut.
The closest parallels to Babb’s predicament could be the destiny of innovators reminiscent of Alfred Russel Wallace, who got here up with the idea of pure choice across the identical time as Charles Darwin, or Gottfried Liebniz, who developed a variant of calculus simply as Isaac Newton did. However fiction isn’t science. It’s a research in emotion and perspective, and Grapes and Unknown are distinct books. Dunkle stated that Grapes of Wrath makes her consider her grandmother, who grew up in Oklahoma. When Dunkle informed her that she was studying Grapes at school, her grandmother snapped: Don’t ever speak to me about Steinbeck once more. “She hated the guide,” Dunkle recalled, “and I couldn’t perceive why.” However the extra intently she learn the influential novel, the extra she seen Steinbeck’s tendency to depict his characters as victims with little company of their very own.
Dunkle’s guide might assist elevate Babb’s standing, not just because it so completely explores the Steinbeck affair however as a result of it succeeds at doing what all good literary biographies do: It makes a case for studying previous writing in new methods. Steinbeck thrived in an period when sweep and melodrama and heft—to not point out manliness—signified high quality literature. Babb, arguably, speaks extra on to this second, which rewards clear portraits of marginalization and a grasp of how sociopolitical forces form on a regular basis relationships. Babb didn’t get the possibility she deserved, however she knew in addition to anybody how a lot the world was suffused with unfairness alongside hope and ambition. It’s proper there within the remaining line of Unknown: “They’d rise and fall and, of their falling, rise once more.”
Once you purchase a guide utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.